BATTLE CREEK, Mich. (Michigan News Source) – A social media post circulating this week has put Meijer at the center of an ongoing national debate: who can use which restrooms – and who decides. The post shows a customer complaint about a transgender employee using the women’s restroom at the Beckley Road location in Battle Creek, along with Meijer’s response.
.@meijer apparently has males employees using the women’s bathroom. A customer reached out about a male employee using the women’s restroom and they said they allow it.
This happened at the location in Battle Creek, Michigan.
If you shop at @meijer, BEWARE!
You can contact… pic.twitter.com/eIVIXmTAmz
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 20, 2026
Meijer said its policy is rooted in federal guidance.
MORE NEWS: Michigan Judge Ends Exception That Forced Life-Sustaining Care For Pregnant Women
The company stated that its policy allows transgender employees and customers to use the restroom they are most comfortable with, citing federal workplace expectations. Meijer’s explanation references standards shaped by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
A change in federal interpretation.
Although limiting access based on gender identity can expose businesses to discrimination claims under certain interpretations of Title VII, the legal landscape appears to be changing. On February 26, 2026, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued a 2-1 appellate decision in Selina S. v. Daniel Driscoll, Secretary, Department of the Army. The Commission said Title VII allows federal agencies to keep single-sex bathrooms and similar private spaces, and to limit access based on biological sex – even when it comes to transgender employees. That ruling reversed a 2015 ruling on the issue. It only applies directly to federal workplaces, not private companies or the courts, but it’s still a notable shift—and one that could start shaping how similar policies are viewed outside the federal government.
Michigan law reinforces inclusive approaches for private employers.
At the state level, Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act includes explicit protections against discrimination based on gender identity or expression in employment and public accommodations. Workplace policies that restrict restroom access based on that factor can be challenged as discriminatory under state law. That puts employers in a position where inclusive policies are often viewed as the safer legal option at the state level, even as federal interpretations evolve.
Balancing policy and public reaction.
While customers raise concerns about privacy and comfort in public restrooms, companies point to compliance obligations and legal risk. For Meijer and other employers, decisions are sometimes less about making a cultural statement and more about following the complex legal landscape. Restroom access policies are increasingly being shaped not just at the store level but also in courtrooms and regulatory agencies.
Michigan News Source reached out to Meijer for additional comment on the controversy but did not receive a response.
